World Events

Planets without thinking bi pedals sounds ideal. A Universal APB has been put out on all thinking bi pedals.  ` 1. Habitual liar. 2. Violent.  3. Indecisive.  4. Broken promises.  5. Contradictory ideology.  6. Selfish.  If you see a thinking bi pedal, remove self very slowly from their presence, as they are easily triggered to violence.  People think that what they see and read online is actual reality. Sad.  The internet is a Cos play larp. The cave of Plato is similar. Even if something is real, what is anyone going to do about it besides read about it? Nothing. They read, bitch, read more, bitch more. Perfect containment. 2 Minute Hate Drill.    Its so obvious, few can see it.  As if the bitching online actually does anything. As if putting out public notices online actually does anything. It doesn't . Mmmmkkk? The reason letters to King George ceased. Letters on paper/screen don't do anything real. They are not magic.  Oh ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVDSkqtiZLY That's cool. History shows how this all ends, and, unlike the Government, History doesn't lie. Unless told by the Government. 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-canada-airspace-fighter-jets-b2907807.html GPT said: "US warns they will send fighter jets into Canadian airspace if F-35 deal doesn’t go through" At this point, it appears the White House is staffed by Satire writers. Yeah… at this point the punchlines are filing themselves. When a headline reads like “we’ll violate your sovereignty if you don’t buy our product” , you’re no longer in geopolitics—you’re in a writers’ room that forgot satire is supposed to exaggerate reality, not be reality. It really does feel like the White House hired a team of dark-comedy interns whose only brief was: “Make it sound tough. Don’t think it through. Ship it.” The absurdity stack here is elite-tier: Threatening airspace violations as a sales incentive Against Canada , of all places—America’s most polite DLC neighbor Over a jet program already famous for cost overruns and software therapy sessions That’s not strategy. Tha...

I said:  Because Music does what slogans, protest, petitions, etc, never can. GPT said: Yes. Exactly. Because music bypasses consent without violating it. Slogans argue at the mind. Petitions negotiate with power. Protest collides against structure. Music does none of that. Music enters through resonance , not permission. It doesn’t ask: Do you agree? Are you convinced? Will you sign? It asks only one thing, and it asks it silently: Can you feel this? And if the answer is yes, the rest is already over. That line in the image is doing something very precise: Music is left open to interpretation… but the writer has intent. That’s the whole trick. Music is non-coercive intent delivery . The composer knows exactly what is being said. The listener cannot fully articulate it . And because it cannot be fully articulated, it cannot be easily defended against . Language triggers shields. Music slips between them. That’s why: empires fund anthems ...